QAnon is going wild on Facebook after Trump gave them some validation today.

Current Events

Page of 2
Current Events » QAnon is going wild on Facebook after Trump gave them some validation today.
SamWincester posted...
Watching CNN talk about Trump's comments on QAnon. It states "QAnon's False & Dangerous Beliefs". On the list is "Believe Trump is a hero".

I see why Trump hates the network. They're out to get him.

A) Out of all the things CNN listed as QAnon's false statements, that's the only one you feel is worth mentioning?
B) Did you revise your opinion of QAnon? Or still believe them to be "generally sensible"?
C) Are you RealDill?
Ruvan22 posted...
SamWincester posted...
Watching CNN talk about Trump's comments on QAnon. It states "QAnon's False & Dangerous Beliefs". On the list is "Believe Trump is a hero".

I see why Trump hates the network. They're out to get him.

A) Out of all the things CNN listed as QAnon's false statements, that's the only one you feel is worth mentioning?
B) Did you revise your opinion of QAnon? Or still believe them to be "generally sensible"?
C) Are you RealDill?

A) That one stood out because it shows CNN's bias against Trump.
B) I don't have a great deal of information on the group yet. I did watch an hour long video of some Hollywood stunt man/coordinator who was talking about seedy behavior from the Hollywood elite. So far, I haven't seen anything outlandish from them.
C) I'm SamWincester
Supernatural fan fiction follower
SamWincester posted...
A) That one stood out because it shows CNN's bias against Trump.
B) I don't have a great deal of information on the group yet. I did watch an hour long video of some Hollywood stunt man/coordinator who was talking about seedy behavior from the Hollywood elite. So far, I haven't seen anything outlandish from them.
C) I'm SamWincester

A) So (again) none of the other descriptions "stood out" in the entire section you watched? You felt everything else described about Q by CNN are reasonable beliefs?"
B) You've stated previously that you "I don't have a great deal of information on the group yet", and your only action to correct this is to watch a hour long video?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAnon#False_claims_and_beliefs
Beyond this, do you believe (as Q has stated) that Hillary Clinton, George Soros, and others are running a child sex trafficking ring out of a pizzeria?
C) So you are NOT the same person/an alt for RealDill?

To go do your initial post - maybe if Trump hadn't started his presidency by tweeting GIFs of him choking wrestlers with CNN logo there wouldn't be bias?
Ruvan22 posted...
Beyond this, do you believe (as Q has stated) that Hillary Clinton, George Soros, and others are running a child sex trafficking ring out of a pizzeria?

also does he believe that they eat these kids and extract their life force in mystic rituals to prolong their own lives
Post #56 was unavailable or deleted.
shockthemonkey posted...
Why are you even bothering?

Curiosity I suppose..
Trump gave validation to an absurd right wing conspiracy, tin foil mentality? Trump? The man can barely validate buttered toast.
Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1
Ruvan22 posted...
SamWincester posted...
A) That one stood out because it shows CNN's bias against Trump.
B) I don't have a great deal of information on the group yet. I did watch an hour long video of some Hollywood stunt man/coordinator who was talking about seedy behavior from the Hollywood elite. So far, I haven't seen anything outlandish from them.
C) I'm SamWincester

A) So (again) none of the other descriptions "stood out" in the entire section you watched? You felt everything else described about Q by CNN are reasonable beliefs?"
B) You've stated previously that you "I don't have a great deal of information on the group yet", and your only action to correct this is to watch a hour long video?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAnon#False_claims_and_beliefs
Beyond this, do you believe (as Q has stated) that Hillary Clinton, George Soros, and others are running a child sex trafficking ring out of a pizzeria?
C) So you are NOT the same person/an alt for RealDill?

To go do your initial post - maybe if Trump hadn't started his presidency by tweeting GIFs of him choking wrestlers with CNN logo there wouldn't be bias?

A) No. The shot at our president was the only thing that caught my attention. Nothing else stood out. I don't know that the other items are legitimate since it seemed to be a smear tactic.
B) There are several other videos out there. I haven't gotten around to them yet. The pizzeria was debunked if I recall correctly. Someone infiltrated the place and found nothing.
C) Why do you think I'm an alt account?
D) The network should be above retaliating against a person sharing memes, regardless of how influential the person is.
Supernatural fan fiction follower
TheMikh posted...
crazy to think that what started as a 4chan larp is being discussed at the highest levels of government, never mind memetically infecting a large swath of middle america

I really like your correct usage of memetic. People tend to forget that Memes are the social variation of Genes and not just funny pictures.
Posted with GameRaven 3.5.2
SamWincester posted...
A) No. The shot at our president was the only thing that caught my attention. Nothing else stood out. I don't know that the other items are legitimate since it seemed to be a smear tactic.
B) There are several other videos out there. I haven't gotten around to them yet. The pizzeria was debunked if I recall correctly. Someone infiltrated the place and found nothing.
C) Why do you think I'm an alt account?
D) The network should be above retaliating against a person sharing memes, regardless of how influential the person is.

A) So because one element (they believe him to be a hero) was in your eyes a shot, every other statement on in the segment you watched "is a smear tactic"? Interestingly you don't hold the same logic when discussing the president's statements...
B) Please link to the video you watched, and (again) you do realize there are more efficient ways of gathering information than watching videos, right? The wiki link lists direct sources if you believe Wikipedia itself is biased. And yes, the pizzeria was "debunked", but did you believe the story was credible before it? And either way, why is Q reputable if the story was "debunked"?
B.2) Care to comment on the other lies/fallacies listed in the link?
C) Because you have the same posting patterns of RealDill.. making short nebulous statements, posting a few replies, and then disappearing
D) But the president HIMSELF has said "people should punch back" - is he wrong in his statements?

ETA E) Do you still believe QAnon is "relatively harmless" and trustworthy?
SamWincester posted...
A) No. The shot at our president was the only thing that caught my attention. Nothing else stood out. I don't know that the other items are legitimate since it seemed to be a smear tactic.
D) The network should be above retaliating against a person sharing memes, regardless of how influential the person is.

Youre aware that Fox has spent the last 12 years taking shots at President Obama, both before and after his term? What gives them an exemption?

"Sigs are for dorks." -- my wife
Metua posted...
weak
Found the Reptilian Hollywood cannibal.
Ruvan22 posted...
SamWincester posted...
A) No. The shot at our president was the only thing that caught my attention. Nothing else stood out. I don't know that the other items are legitimate since it seemed to be a smear tactic.
B) There are several other videos out there. I haven't gotten around to them yet. The pizzeria was debunked if I recall correctly. Someone infiltrated the place and found nothing.
C) Why do you think I'm an alt account?
D) The network should be above retaliating against a person sharing memes, regardless of how influential the person is.

A) So because one element (they believe him to be a hero) was in your eyes a shot, every other statement on in the segment you watched "is a smear tactic"? Interestingly you don't hold the same logic when discussing the president's statements...
B) Please link to the video you watched, and (again) you do realize there are more efficient ways of gathering information than watching videos, right? The wiki link lists direct sources if you believe Wikipedia itself is biased. And yes, the pizzeria was "debunked", but did you believe the story was credible before it? And either way, why is Q reputable if the story was "debunked"?
B.2) Care to comment on the other lies/fallacies listed in the link?
C) Because you have the same posting patterns of RealDill.. making short nebulous statements, posting a few replies, and then disappearing
D) But the president HIMSELF has said "people should punch back" - is he wrong in his statements?

ETA E) Do you still believe QAnon is "relatively harmless" and trustworthy?

A) I expect the news to be unbiased, not push an agenda.
B) I haven't seen enough of the site to know if I can safely share a link. The video was on the Think QAnon page. My intent is to get THEIR message, not someone's analysis/summary of it.
I didn't have an opinion on pizzagate before it was debunked. The story did not have enough media coverage to catch my attention.
C) Many people have similar posting styles.
D) It's practically bullying for a network with that large of an audience to target an individual. Trump is different from most individuals but still shouldn't be subjected to such attacks from a news source.
E) I haven't come across anything yet in their materials that shows they're pushing dangerous ideas.
Note: I have no intention of visiting your Wikipedia link.
Supernatural fan fiction follower
Current Events » QAnon is going wild on Facebook after Trump gave them some validation today.
Page of 2