kinetika_ posted...
Error1355 posted...
@Maze_
posted...
To be fair to Bioware, Mass Effect 3's ending did more damage to the franchise than Andromeda ever did.
They made another Mass Effect after 3.
They shuttered the studio, canceled the DLC and sequel after Andromeda. I have no idea how you can make the claim that ME3 was worse for the franchise.
Yeah, I mean the ending was lame... but overall, the game was good. I liked it better than ME2, which will always be the worst in the trilogy for me.
I loved ME2 and was disappointed that 3 shit on everything it was building. x.x
Here's my quickly thought out ending to how I wanted ME3 to go:
You build your forces throughout ME3 like normal, maybe having a path to bring Cerberus into the fold and not have them just be "lolindoctrinated bad guys". You still build The Crucible but it's a ship capable of going toe-to-toe with Reapers.The ending sequence is you leading your forces into a massive space battle with the Reapers, the Crucible is a real threat to them so you use it as a distraction basically while you sneak in on the Normandy to board Harbinger. Once you and your team do that you make your way through it and bring him down from inside.
Yeah it sounds somewhat similar to ME2's ending but I felt Harbinger wasn't given nearly enough justice in ME3. 2 was setting it up so it had a personal vendetta/obsession with Shepherd and it never got played out properly. I know my idea isn't the most creative but it's a damn sight better than what we got.
Also
I'd make Space Ninja Edgelord actually threatening and not some Xbox Live-tier raging kid.
