But curious to your views on it?
What a bait topic as if Neverland didn't exist. "Maybe" MJ didn't touch little boys, but he did have an awful lot come close to crossing lines.Well, tiger wasn't a pedophile. He was just caught cheating and was fucked up and wrecked his car lol
Tiger Woods is a confusing one. It's like golf forgot he was a crummy person and celebrated his return, and everyone else just kinda moved on. That man was chased by his wife...
I dont think MJ was a pedo. I think he was just weird.Thats my take too. He didnt have a childhood so he acted kinda odd, which made people make tabloid stories of him likely.
now why would you go and defend it like that
On the one hand, I get where PO is coming from. Epstein's shenanigans are far from unique, and are only at all noteworthy because it's a rare case of actually being able to hold the culprits accountable for them.
One of these days you're finally going to develop reading comprehension, and I'm going to be fucking amazed.
Or that it's even trustworthy at this point, considering how many hands its passed through by this point, and how much opportunity there's been to tamper with it. It's never going to be a magical smoking gun that brings all the perverts to justice.
But what did Tiger do to rehabilitate himself?Once again, I'd say what vick did was a lot worse and people do celebrate michael vick still. The Falcons wish him a happy bday every year.
Other athletes, like say Vick, actually served time and gave back to society, and teams were still very hesitant to take him.
Tiger did what? Give his fans time to miss him? His return was celebrated.
Thats my take too. He didnt have a childhood so he acted kinda odd, which made people make tabloid stories of him likely.a lot of adults without childhoods will regress and act like children so I think thats what he did
a lot of adults without childhoods will regress and act like children so I think thats what he didHe may have been innocent but he brought the attention on himself by having children sleep over with him
Yeah, at this point, nothing about "the list" is particularly credible. Half of the people suspected to be on it have had a chance to modify it, and the other half is friends with the first half. To put any stock in "the list" is to assume that there's anyone at the top of the justice system seriously looking for solid evidence to bring corrupt people in places of power to justice, and that assumption grossly underestimates just how much power those corrupt people have.There's also the possibility of names having been added as well as removed. There are only one source I'd mostly believe now and one I'd kinda-sorta believe. The first is the list being compiled by the victims themselves, and the second would be if Maxwell had a safety deposit box or something that she hasn't had contact with since before she was arrested.
We'll never know the truth about all the epstein stuff unless the government were to be overturned which likely wont ever happen. That list is dying with everyone connected to itWhy would you believe it even if the government were to be overturned? It's almost certainly been tampered with already, you'd at best be getting a tampered version.
Why would you believe it even if the government were to be overturned? It's almost certainly been tampered with already, you'd at best be getting a tampered version.Yes, I mean a complete change from the bottom up. I dont care about a list really. There is plenty of evidence being concealed that involves much more than a list. I doubt it's all been destroyed. Probably just changed hands
And I'm also assuming you mean a complete governmental change, as the Democrats didn't seem any more willing to release the list than the current administration is. MAYBE in 50 years after everyone possibly involved has died of old age.
Why would you believe it even if the government were to be overturned? It's almost certainly been tampered with already, you'd at best be getting a tampered version.