Woodstock 1999

Poll of the Day

Poll of the Day » Woodstock 1999
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAWuRiHHKXQ2
Cyanide Angel: My first Action RPG/Sidescroller on itch.io
OUT NOW
Hell yeah
wasn't it a disaster? i think i'll pass
all times and music eastern
If I were under the age of 22, quite likely.

People like to blame Limp Bizkit for the chaos that broke out. There are other bands that you could probably put more blame on, but really, it's on the festival organizers.
girls like my fa
Also, if you haven't seen this, it's hilarious
https://youtu.be/5psGAkil1tU
girls like my fa
tbf I would have been more drawn to Woodstock '94
girls like my fa
actually, reading the wiki for woodstock '99 is kinda fucked. I will retract my willingness to attend.
girls like my fa
i like how noodle from the offspring said he's played at nazi built places that were more hospitable than the air force base woodstock 99 was at

like iirc the whole area turned into its own heat island it was so fucked
I put maybe, but in answer to it directly no. It was to far away and I didn't feel like traveling to go. Had I been close to where it was held back then I might have gone I don't know. Listening to Sevendust play live would have been epic.
Honestly I wasn't a huge fan of any of the bands and there was literally poop in mud that got everywhere and people got sick.

There is water at the bottom of the ocean
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/5/52167a6e.jpg
ReturnOfFa posted...
tbf I would have been more drawn to Woodstock '94

That one had better conditions even the security couldn't keep track of the holes in the fences at the 94 one
Cyanide Angel: My first Action RPG/Sidescroller on itch.io
OUT NOW
ReturnOfFa posted...
If I were under the age of 22, quite likely.

I was 22 in 1999, and I had zero fucking interest in it.



ReturnOfFa posted...
tbf I would have been more drawn to Woodstock '94

I watched it on PPV. Apart from the ridiculousness of the Nine Inch Nails set, it was mostly boring. And I never would have wanted to be there.

Both concerts were basically what you get when a bunch of assholes who grew up hearing a ton of ex-hippies (mostly ex-hippies who weren't even there ) talking up how awesome Woodstock was and how meaningful a cultural moment it was, who desperately wanted to have their own "moment", without ever doing anything to earn it.

The original Woodstock basically became iconic by accident. The later events were cynical exploitation.
"Wall of Text'D!" --- oldskoolplayr76
"POwned again." --- blight family
ParanoidObsessive posted...
I was 22 in 1999, and I had zero fucking interest in it.

I watched it on PPV. Apart from the ridiculousness of the Nine Inch Nails set, it was mostly boring. And I never would have wanted to be there.

Both concerts were basically what you get when a bunch of assholes who grew up hearing a ton of ex-hippies (mostly ex-hippies who weren't even there ) talking up how awesome Woodstock was and how meaningful a cultural moment it was, who desperately wanted to have their own "moment", without ever doing anything to earn it.

The original Woodstock basically became iconic by accident. The later events were cynical exploitation.
Honestly, reading how shitty it was in print definitely made me rethink it completely. I'd watched that documentary about it, but it really didn't hit all the details.

I'm romanticizing the fact that Primus' set was awesome - it also was a bloody muddy gorilla pit. And right...there was mud in so many of the sets. NIN, Green Day...
girls like my fa
ReturnOfFa posted...
And right...there was mud in so many of the sets. NIN, Green Day...

That's because it was pouring rain earlier in the day, and the entire ground in front of the stage turned into a mud pit.

Primus got nailed on their stage because they unfortunately had a song called "My Name is Mud" - so of course people in the audience started flinging it at them.

What made the NIN set so awesome was the fact that the whole band basically just flung themselves into the mud and thrashed around a bit before their set, so they were covered in as much mud as everyone else. And then as the set went on it was still drizzling, so they sort of slowly turned back into soaking wet human beings as the mud washed off. It was a cool spectacle. Even if Trent Reznor apparently hated it after the fact.

With Green Day, it felt kind of lame, because they were on the next day, and it felt a bit like they'd heard about how people were referring to the Primus and NIN sets as being iconic, so they were trying to kind of cynically make themselves part of it.

I'd definitely say the NIN set was the highlight of the entire festival. They definitely upstaged Metallica, who went on after them. It was absolutely the one performance everybody was talking about afterwards.
"Wall of Text'D!" --- oldskoolplayr76
"POwned again." --- blight family
Post #17 was unavailable or deleted.
the lineup was kinda ass tbh
im gay
coyot posted...
shes lump is a good song alright

not a primus song
Presidents of the United States did Lump and then Peaches
Cyanide Angel: My first Action RPG/Sidescroller on itch.io
OUT NOW
Music_Rock_Cat posted...
Presidents of the United States did Lump and then Peaches

Fuck California
Meanwhile Back in the City

Both bangers
No thanks. It was nowhere near where I lived; plus, boorish crowds and live music have never been my preference.
"Shhh! Ben, don't ruin the ending!" --Adrian Ripburger, Full Throttle
ReturnOfFa posted...
actually, reading the wiki for woodstock '99 is kinda fucked. I will retract my willingness to attend.
Down the Wikipedia rabbit hole I go!
yeah, I'm thinking I'm back
You also had to put up with shit like this if you went to Woodstock 1999 at the time. Wyclef Jean trying to cover Hendrix and even almost lighting himself on fire on accident

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85X4iF0jWV0
Cyanide Angel: My first Action RPG/Sidescroller on itch.io
OUT NOW
coyot posted...
shes lump
She's in my head.
If there are no LGBTQ+ rights, there are no rights at all.
https://linktr.ee/KalloFox34 | SW-6764-3759-9672 | He/they | Bi | 21 | Atheist | pfp by Sangled
ParanoidObsessive posted...


I was 22 in 1999, and I had zero fucking interest in it.

I watched it on PPV. Apart from the ridiculousness of the Nine Inch Nails set, it was mostly boring. And I never would have wanted to be there.

Both concerts were basically what you get when a bunch of assholes who grew up hearing a ton of ex-hippies (mostly ex-hippies who weren't even there ) talking up how awesome Woodstock was and how meaningful a cultural moment it was, who desperately wanted to have their own "moment", without ever doing anything to earn it.

The original Woodstock basically became iconic by accident. The later events were cynical exploitation.


The tragic thing is we got our own meaningful cultural moment a couple years after that I cant say we necessarily earned it either.

GenX and the millenials got their event that was equally as memorable, unprecedented, and influential with consequences that are felt to this very day. Both moments were incredibly transformational and meaningful. and it is also impossible to truly understand the gravity of either moment if you werent alive and old enough to remember them well. However the 2 moments were meaningful for drastically opposite reasons.

If the boomers most meaningful cultural moment was Woodstock, then GenX and the Millenials most meaningful and influential cultural moment was 9/11.
Poll of the Day » Woodstock 1999