keyblader1985 posted...
I'm just kind of rambling
It's an interesting topic. I know I find myself able to forgive unrealistic actions or results a lot more easily if the change doesn't result in a negative emotion. To me if the emotion I feel is negative, the story needs to justify it and often times with anime, the justification is poor (like, why didn't the character use this one power that would have saved them or why did they even fight this person, etc). I remember there was one anime, dusk maiden of amnesia, where it had the ending that made sense and
was bittersweat, but then 30 seconds later the went back on it and everyone lived happily ever after
. I remember actually being really happy about that. Like they gave me both endings.
As the negative example, katanagatari sticks out in my head. The main girl and her rival had literally no reason to ever fight. Their goals were compatible and they didn't hate each other or anything.
When the main girl gets killed
so that rival girl can get an audience to assassinate the shogun, all the logic just fell apart.
Her ninja that actually was going to do the assassination was not allowed in and just snuck in and made it to the shogun's room
which means everything that happened in the entire show happened for no reason. They literally could have done that in episode 1. THEN, main guy
reverting back to his sword breaking weapon form, the way he started the show, was able to just fight his way up to the shogun
which they ALSO could have done in episode 1 (well I guess episode 2). The entire collecting swords for an audience with the shogun was completely pointless despite that being 95% of the shows runtime. My negative emotion I felt when
the girl was killed
was not something I felt the narrative logically justified and so I still seethe over it 15 years later. How dare they. If you are going to write bad, at least give me a happy ending.
Then as a middle ground example (and to prove I don't just hate all sad endings), cyberpunk edgerunners was perfect. The choices that led to the outcome we got all made sense for those characters to make. When the characters make the "wrong" choice, it feels like the choice they would make.
Texnohlyze also has a very depressing ending that I felt it justified perfectly.
However, I feel like I'm the only person in the world that feels this way about things. I've seen tons of people gush about now and then, here and there, despite every character making the dumbest choice in every possible opportunity for the entire show to the point of making no sense.
Speaking more to your initial manga thing I kind of get where they are coming from but I would need to see it to know if it fits. There's times when I watch something and I can tell what the author thought was the correct thing and they are just wrong about that. It's very different than the character doing the same exact thing but the author clearly thinking it's the wrong choice or remaining neutral.
There's also the sense that realism can be kind of annoying to watch. The most famous example is shinji not getting in the robot but imagine if like 95% of characters just sat around cowering too afraid to act in desperate situations. We can see time and again in real life, thats often what happens. 50+ people are present and MAYBE 1 person actually does something.
Ultimately I think fiction generally benefits from making things as unrealistic as it can without breaking suspension of disbelief, but where that limit is varies greatly from person to person. Mine is quite low, I generally need things to be fairly realistic, but other people can completely ignore what for me are dealbreakers. I also think FMA original anime is better than brotherhood. The tone just feels more mature and less shonen bullshit even when they cover the same arcs.