I'm just kind of rambling, so feel free to ignore this. But something that happened the other day got me thinking. Someone was pretty upset about a manga that I posted on Imgur, because of a problem with the main character's actions. Even after being told that that particular problem was not an issue anymore beyond the first chapter, they continued to judge and write off the whole thing because the manga didn't
explicitly
portray the character's actions in a negative light.
That got me thinking about how people can let their personal biases on certain things affect their objective judgment of a work. Like I've seen people demonize and call for boycott of a series because a character forced a kiss on a girl when he was drunk, despite the fact that it was treated seriously and he immensely regretted and apologized for it. Or (as an example involving something not objectively bad) when in a different series a character's past was revealed as well as the fact that they're not a virgin - at which point Japanese fans lost their shit, flaming the series, the author, and destroying merchandise they had purchased.
It didn't make sense to me how people will condemn a work because of character flaws, because not having flaws means everyone is perfect and makes it hard to have any personal growth. But then that got me thinking of how I sort of have the opposite problem with Fullmetal Alchemist Brotherhood/manga. In many cases everything feels just a little TOO perfect. Besides some things happening at just the right time or place purely out of convenience, most of the protagonists are so pure, so badass, so dedicated to fighting the good fight that it just feels unrealistic; put real people in the same stakes and you'd see many people being too scared to fight, fleeing the country, or even selling out to try to get in on what Father was (supposedly) offering.
And the ending itself was entirely too safe and unrealistic considering everything that was at stake. In the final battle
all the bad guys were killed, arrested, or otherwise taken care of with very few casualties among the good guys, and everyone left got what they were fighting for and/or found a perfect resolution to their story
. As a narrative the whole thing is damn near immaculate, with many heavy themes that can be applied to real life - but that doesn't change the fact that the way it plays out is just not true to life.
That's one of the reasons that I personally prefer the 2003 series; for all its flaws and strange story decisions (and there are many), the choices people make almost always feel natural and realistic. It makes sense that even though it has to be done, the Elrics, Izumi and Scar still would have trouble fighting
Sloth, Wrath and Lust, respectively
. In the end amid many heavy losses, when
Edward himself died, it's natural that Alphonse, having both the knowledge and the means to potentially revive him, would do so with little hesitation, and that when Ed learned that his little brother was gone, he'd attempt the same
. And in the movie Ed saw firsthand the the atrocities committed as a result of
the worlds being connected, so he saw it as his duty to put an end to it even if it meant being permanently separated from his world - and his brother chose to be with him in the end
.
Everyone is trying to do what they think is best, although they sometimes falter for personal reasons, some storylines don't get any real resolution (which is also realistic; a lot of times you just have to learn to make peace with the past and live with what you've got), and the few people left remaining at the end have to give up on their desires for a greater good. To me it all just feels like a heavier and more heartfelt ending than "
we won, we got what we want and we all lived
" in Brotherhood.
Official King of PotD
You only need one T-Rex to make the point, though.
~ Samus Sedai