Some people just want that vigilante justice.I was being sarcastic. That wouldn't have done anything.
why do people keep trying to argue that it was a "professional hit"Well clearly he's getting away with it still, so I'd say that's something. If it was some random schitzo/idiot, they would definitely be caught by now.
a professional isn't going to just do it in broad daylight lmao
Would have lost because what United Healthcare was doing wasn't illegal.UHC does illegal things all the time, it's a core part of their business model. They make more profit off spurious claim denials than they lose in court cases, so it's a net gain.
Well clearly he's getting away with it still, so I'd say that's something. If it was some random schitzo/idiot, they would definitely be caught by now.
She seems to disagree with you on that point.So I noticed. lol.
why do people keep trying to argue that it was a "professional hit"Access. Knowing where and when to find the target is half the job, especially since he caught the target without any sort of security. While the tradecraft he showed seems to be the sort of thing you can find in a book or movie, he does seem to have pulled it off reasonably well.
a professional isn't going to just do it in broad daylight lmao
i get that that's unusual given recent events, but in the grand scheme of murders, it's really not. look at how many serial killers got away with their actions for so long. look at how many unsolved murders there are.Most murders don't get the resources devoted to tracking the killer as this incident, nor do they have as much evidence or as many witness/video recordings as this one. You can reasonably say that it's because the victim was a billionaire but a city councilman or similar level person would get the same treatment if the assassination was carried out as brazenly and publicly.
UHC does illegal things all the time, it's a core part of their business model. They make more profit off spurious claim denials than they lose in court cases, so it's a net gain.
Because misdirection and false flags have never existed. You're too emotionally invested in being right here to see any other alternative.tell us about false flags for fun I'm intrigued
Revenge does seem to be the most likely explanation if only due to the size of the suspect pool, but most people in that position don't seem to be the type to be able to afford what sounds like a professional hit. Maybe he pissed off a real life Jason Bourne or something.
Knowing where and when to find the target is half the jobLinkedIn
II took a loot at my insurance card. Turns out I have United healthcare/with Medicarerx. Not sure how my family got me on that but Im not going to ask questions. My meds are free through them so thats good.it blows my mind that people are dumb enough to think that an inside job is more likely than somebody ascertaining someone's location
Then I saw this: Copay: PCP $15, specs $20, ER $65 (Luckily Ive never had to go)
I still think this was an inside job. How did the shooter know the guy was going to be there? No way he was just lucky
Jen got suspended.rip
Jen got suspended.
Think shell cry about it in AskTheMods like you do?Dont worry little bro, shell be back soon. Just try to be brave until then. :)
Lmao, what'd she say?
Long-winded way of saying no, big guy.Well when Jen gets back, Im sure youll be hearing plenty of nos.
Lmao, what'd she say?Post 91. Watch me get suspended for it as well.
Revenge does seem to be the most likely explanation if only due to the size of the suspect pool, but most people in that position don't seem to be the type to be able to afford what sounds like a professional hit. Maybe he pissed off a real life Jason Bourne or something.
Think shell cry about it in AskTheMods like you do?lmao
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/6/68232e8c.jpg
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/6/68232e8c.jpgI still say he looks like hes wearing a Guy Fawks mask in the left pic.
I still say he looks like hes wearing a Guy Fawks mask in the left pic.
I know the system has not worked mostly due to moral hazard. It includes those that were putting serious damage to their body voluntarily because they know insurance will try to cover them that started the skyrocketing prices, not just if there are many sick with preexisting conditions, they won't have to pay more in premiums but the healthier population will have to pay for the sick. Which is fine, but it's the reason why insurance companies like UHC were denying some expensive claims because they couldn't attract enough of the healthier population into the insurance pool. At the end of the day, you have to ask yourself, despite CEOs having a salary, is it the system that premeditated the murders or the CEO making money off the sick that premeditated murders and is premeditated murders right for whatever reason in the end?
the reason why insurance companies like UHC were denying some expensive claims because they couldn't attract enough of the healthier population into the insurance pool.
what sounds like a professional hit.
I know the system has not worked mostly due to moral hazard. It includes those that were putting serious damage to their body voluntarily because they know insurance will try to cover them that started the skyrocketing prices, not just if there are many sick with preexisting conditions, they won't have to pay more in premiums but the healthier population will have to pay for the sick. Which is fine, but it's the reason why insurance companies like UHC were denying some expensive claims because they couldn't attract enough of the healthier population into the insurance pool. At the end of the day, you have to ask yourself, despite CEOs having a salary, is it the system that premeditated the murders or the CEO making money off the sick that premeditated murders and is premeditated murders right for whatever reason in the end?
just happy to see society collapsing in a good direction for once tbhI wouldn't be so quick. We just elected a laughable corrupt billionaire and his gang of billionaire buddies to president.
UHC made $22,000,000,000 in profits last year. Not revenue, profits.On $281 billion in revenue. A 7.8% profit is large but not smaller than many other industries.
Do they, as a business, need to make some money? Absolutely. Do they need to make enough money that they could slash their claim denial rate in half and still be comfortably wealthy? Absolutely not.While I can't find absolute dollar values for claims UHC denied last year, given their denial rate it's mathematically impossible for half that number to be lower than their profit for the year. So while what you posted may feel true to you, it is in fact absolutely false.
I've seen a couple comments from people that are more familiar with guns on the fact that his gun kept jamming that said that's a common problem using regular handgun ammo in a suppressed pistol, since there isn't enough pressure to keep things moving smoothly with the extra barrel length and backpressure. That alone tells me it probably wasn't a professional hit, since I would expect a professional to know more about choosing compatible equipment than that.Then the "people more familiar with guns" are lying to you, because silencers increase back pressure rather than reduce it. Malfunctions due to insufficient back pressure is a problem when firing blanks, which is clearly not what happened in this incident.
On $281 billion in revenue. A 7.8% profit is large but not smaller than many other industries.
While I can't find absolute dollar values for claims UHC denied last year, given their denial rate it's mathematically impossible for half that number to be lower than their profit for the year. So while what you posted may feel true to you, it is in fact absolutely false.
Then the "people more familiar with guns" are lying to you, because silencers increase back pressure rather than reduce it. Malfunctions due to insufficient back pressure is a problem when firing blanks, which is clearly not what happened in this incident.
On $281 billion in revenue. A 7.8% profit is large but not smaller than many other industries.
While I can't find absolute dollar values for claims UHC denied last year, given their denial rate it's mathematically impossible for half that number to be lower than their profit for the year. So while what you posted may feel true to you, it is in fact absolutely false.
Then the "people more familiar with guns" are lying to you, because silencers increase back pressure rather than reduce it. Malfunctions due to insufficient back pressure is a problem when firing blanks, which is clearly not what happened in this incident.
Which is fine, but it's the reason why insurance companies like UHC were denying some expensive claims because they couldn't attract enough of the healthier population into the insurance pool.
For that matter, "they had to deny claims because they need to attract more healthy customers into the pool" is profoundly flawed logic. If you need more customers, you don't attract them by abandoning your existing customers to die.Perfectly explaining why this system is broken.
I'm just saying, if you or any of your family members were shot and killed with the killer on the run, they wouldn't offer 50k.I mean, $50k is still small, especially for this type of assassination. And considering the guy is being celebrated as essentially Robin Hood, that's not near big enough for someone to care.
FBI just upped the bounty to 50,000$.Illinois just paid off one $25k reward and there's another $25k active. Neither victim was a billionaire. True that's only $50k between the two, but it's not the typical crimestoppers level of reward either.
HAHAHAHA
Legendary
I'm just saying, if you or any of your family members were shot and killed with the killer on the run, they wouldn't offer 50k.
Such preferential treatment for our wealthy class.