On its face this seems dumb.
or they will never, ever, show his face and modulate his voice to be not quite the sameWhy even say it's Robert Downy Jr then?
or they will never, ever, show his face and modulate his voice to be not quite the same
Paying for RDJ and then not using his face or voice would be quite a waste. Dude's expensive.
listening to the naysayers of disney, you'd come to the conclusion that disney has been in dire straits for decadesI think its more so that the Marvel movies use to be sure thing billion dollar money makers but now not so much. I can see why people are calling this a desperation move because Disney is hoping RDJ can reignite that spark the movies once had like he did with Iron Man originally. Its like James Cameron going back to Linda Hamilton thinking that is what the Terminator movies were missing, but just like that, I think this decision will flop as well.
everything they do is apparently always "panicked desperation"
and yet they somehow always seem to be just fine
Could have just recast Kang...
They aren't in dire straits financially but they are in dire straits quality-wise."Dire straits quality-wise" isn't a thing. Otherwise McDonald's and Walmart would've went bankrupt ages ago.
but they are in dire straits quality-wisethis isn't a thing.
If people continue to watch blockbusters with a ton of CGI and special effects then they will continue to make money.China sure loves them and doesn't show any sign of stopping anytime soon
China sure loves them and doesn't show any sign of stopping anytime soonEh, Hollywood film releases in China are a lot more restricted than they used to be and are competing with a much stronger domestic film industry.
to add: star wars die hards love to scream until they pass out that disney ruined star wars.
star wars is the most successful it has ever been in its entire history. clearly, they are doing something right despite the angry fanboys screaming about whatever current star wars things ruins everything in established star wars history
I'd argue they have a quantity problem more than a quality problem right now, or at least they did (they've slowed down the last couple years). They were putting out more than was necessary to meet demand.
I'm super excited for him to be featured in all the trailers and promo material and end up being a bit part like Professor X in Dr strange or the after credits to Avengers 1. Or better yet some Thor style asguardian play.Apparently they're paying him at least 80 million for it, so I doubt this very much
On its face this seems dumb.
So like most of the MCU post-Endgame then.
Could have just recast Kang...
I don't think that'll ever happen given what he was charged with. Disney is a PG company and stuff.
The Kang stuff had mostly sucked anyway. One-off villain? Okay. All that build just looked goofy, though.
one off? he was in multiple movies and shows as an antagonist of some sort.
hell, loki season 2 was entirely about him.
he had literally more build up than thanos before they dropped him.